Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs NRFNX
CSSPX vs NRFNX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs NRFNX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.01
Change+$0.13 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N
Price$11.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.44M
CSSPX vs NRFNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. NRFNX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and NRFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. NRFNX (34.4M). NRFNX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: NRFNX (3.16) vs CSSPX (2.83). CSSPX was incepted earlier than NRFNX: CSSPX (28 years) vs NRFNX (12 years). NRFNX (1.61) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). NRFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). CSSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRFNX: CSSPX (100000) vs NRFNX (1000000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. NRFNX (3.64). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 34.24 vs. NRFNX (24.60).
| CSSPX | NRFNX | CSSPX / NRFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.85 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.61 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.522 | 4.219 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 34.4M | 5,834% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 3.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.25 | 3.64 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.88 | 11.97 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.24 | 24.60 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.31 | -10.23 | -443% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement