Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs NRFNX
CSSPX vs NRFNX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs NRFNX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.49
Change+$0.25 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate N
Price$11.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.57M
CSSPX vs NRFNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. NRFNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and NRFNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. NRFNX (34.6M). NRFNX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: NRFNX (3.06) vs CSSPX (2.62). CSSPX was incepted earlier than NRFNX: CSSPX (28 years) vs NRFNX (12 years). NRFNX (1.24) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). NRFNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). CSSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRFNX: CSSPX (100000) vs NRFNX (1000000). NRFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. CSSPX (8.35). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 24.04 vs. NRFNX (17.86).
| CSSPX | NRFNX | CSSPX / NRFNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.87 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.24 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.270 | 4.465 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 34.6M | 5,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 3.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 8.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.01 | 3.79 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.04 | 17.86 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.56 | -7.07 | -658% |