Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs SWASX
CSSPX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.38
Change+$0.22 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
CSSPX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. SWASX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. SWASX (284M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: SWASX (3.33) vs CSSPX (2.87). CSSPX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSSPX (28 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSSPX (0.93) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). SWASX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: SWASX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. CSSPX (6.39). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.89 vs. SWASX (17.74).
| CSSPX | SWASX | CSSPX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.72 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.72 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.259 | 7.308 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 284M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 3.33 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 8.12 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.82 | 5.28 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.89 | 17.74 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.39 | 30.99 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement