Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs SWASX
CSSPX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$51.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.19
Change-$0.12 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.4M
CSSPX vs SWASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. SWASX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. SWASX (275M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: SWASX (3.34) vs CSSPX (2.74). CSSPX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSSPX (28 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSSPX (0.92) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.71). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSSPX (52.00). SWASX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: SWASX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. CSSPX (6.59). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 52.29 vs. SWASX (39.73).
| CSSPX | SWASX | CSSPX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.71 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.71 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.449 | 1.607 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 275M | 656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 3.34 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 7.09 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.56 | -12.62 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.29 | 39.73 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.35 | 19.22 | 174% |