Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs TARZX
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TARZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.46
Change+$0.07 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
Price$25.01
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.94M
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TARZX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and TARZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. TARZX (352M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TARZX: CSSPX (2.83) vs TARZX (0.82). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TARZX: CSSPX (28 years) vs TARZX (7 years). TARZX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TARZX (5.00). TARZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: TARZX (25000) vs CSSPX (100000). TARZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.19 vs. CSSPX (11.52). CSSPX (32.91) and TARZX (31.37) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSSPX | TARZX | CSSPX / TARZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.05 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.278 | 7.782 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 25000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 352M | 566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 0.82 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.52 | 19.19 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.38 | 19.38 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.91 | 31.37 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers