Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs TARZX
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TARZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$53.14
Change-$0.47 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
Price$23.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.3M
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TARZX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and TARZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. TARZX (304M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TARZX: CSSPX (2.69) vs TARZX (0.88). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TARZX: CSSPX (28 years) vs TARZX (7 years). TARZX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TARZX (5.00). TARZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: TARZX (25000) vs CSSPX (100000). TARZX (9.26) and CSSPX (9.19) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 36.37 vs. TARZX (24.85).
| CSSPX | TARZX | CSSPX / TARZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.05 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.10 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.114 | 0.344 | 1,196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 25000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 304M | 639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 0.88 | 307% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.19 | 9.26 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.40 | 6.34 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.37 | 24.85 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...