Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs TARZX
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TARZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.24
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
Price$23.76
Change-$0.08 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.23M
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TARZX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and TARZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. TARZX (335M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TARZX: CSSPX (2.62) vs TARZX (0.84). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TARZX: CSSPX (28 years) vs TARZX (7 years). TARZX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TARZX (5.00). TARZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: TARZX (25000) vs CSSPX (100000). TARZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.17 vs. CSSPX (8.24). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 24.04 vs. TARZX (17.06).
| CSSPX | TARZX | CSSPX / TARZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.05 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.270 | 2.494 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 25000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 335M | 580% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 0.84 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 10.17 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.91 | 3.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.04 | 17.06 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement