Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs TARZX
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TARZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$51.60
Change+$0.79 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
Price$22.09
Change+$0.24 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.55M
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TARZX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and TARZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. TARZX (286M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TARZX: CSSPX (2.74) vs TARZX (0.87). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TARZX: CSSPX (28 years) vs TARZX (7 years). TARZX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. TARZX (5.00). TARZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: TARZX (25000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.04 vs. TARZX (7.11). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 30.71 vs. TARZX (19.06).
| CSSPX | TARZX | CSSPX / TARZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.05 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.10 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | -6.062 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 25000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 286M | 669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 0.87 | 315% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.04 | 7.11 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.68 | -10.32 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.71 | 19.06 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers