Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs TARZX
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TARZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$52.58
Change-$0.49 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
Price$23.82
Change-$0.42 (-1.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.01M
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TARZX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and TARZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. TARZX (316M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TARZX: CSSPX (2.86) vs TARZX (1.39). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TARZX: CSSPX (28 years) vs TARZX (7 years). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. TARZX (8.00). TARZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: TARZX (25000) vs CSSPX (100000). TARZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.30 vs. CSSPX (7.69). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 1.59 vs. TARZX (-3.92).
| CSSPX | TARZX | CSSPX / TARZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.017 | 2.408 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 25000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 316M | 567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 1.39 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.69 | 11.30 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.05 | -0.90 | 674% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.59 | -3.92 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...