Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs TARZX
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TARZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$55.21
Change+$0.54 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z
Price$26.49
Change+$0.32 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets368.69M
CSSPX vs TARZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TARZX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and TARZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. TARZX (369M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TARZX: CSSPX (2.77) vs TARZX (0.77). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TARZX: CSSPX (28 years) vs TARZX (8 years). TARZX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TARZX (5.00). TARZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: TARZX (25000) vs CSSPX (100000). TARZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. CSSPX (1.35). TARZX return over 5 years is better than : 31.79 vs. CSSPX (28.03).
| CSSPX | TARZX | CSSPX / TARZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.05 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.10 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.911 | 13.886 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 25000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 369M | 537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 0.77 | 359% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.35 | 14.20 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.18 | 28.69 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.03 | 31.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers