Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs TIRGX
CSSPX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.2M
CSSPX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. TIRGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and TIRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. TIRGX (66.2M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSSPX (2.83) vs TIRGX (2.49). CSSPX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSSPX (28 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSSPX (100000) vs TIRGX (500000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.37 vs. TIRGX (7.41). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.27 vs. TIRGX (12.96).
| CSSPX | TIRGX | CSSPX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.73 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.21 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.577 | 3.319 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 66.2M | 3,012% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.49 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.37 | 7.41 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | 5.54 | 229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.27 | 12.96 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement