Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSVX vs NRGSX
CSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSVX vs NRGSX
Carillon Chartwell Small Cap R-6
Price$31.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.25M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
CSSVX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSVX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSVX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. CSSVX (224M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than CSSVX: NRGSX (0.07) vs CSSVX (0.00). CSSVX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CSSVX (8 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CSSVX (0.85) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CSSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). CSSVX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.85 vs. NRGSX (-14.54). CSSVX return over 5 years is better than : -7.00 vs. NRGSX (-10.73).
| CSSVX | NRGSX | CSSVX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.74 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.339 | -7.544 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 8.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.85 | -14.54 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.09 | -4.05 | -496% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.00 | -10.73 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers