Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs SSGSX
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$22.87
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.31M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.63B
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.63B vs. CSSZX (387M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: CSSZX (0.66) vs SSGSX (0.50). CSSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: CSSZX (15 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.05). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSSZX (20.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: CSSZX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.93 vs. CSSZX (-6.87). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.89 vs. SSGSX (20.68).
| CSSZX | SSGSX | CSSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.573 | 1.852 | 301% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 5.63B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.50 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.87 | -3.93 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.31 | -0.85 | -390% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.89 | 20.68 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.13 | 24.03 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement