Ad is loading...
CSSZX vs SSGSX
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$19.86
Change+$0.33 (+1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.84M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.78
Change+$0.72 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. CSSZX (357M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: CSSZX (0.73) vs SSGSX (0.54). CSSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: CSSZX (15 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.05). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSSZX (7.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: CSSZX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.71 vs. CSSZX (-15.81). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 33.98 vs. SSGSX (20.02).
| CSSZX | SSGSX | CSSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.041 | -11.566 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357M | 5.44B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.54 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.81 | -13.71 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.58 | -10.63 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.98 | 20.02 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.53 | 5.67 | -239% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers