Ad is loading...
CSSZX vs SSGSX
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$19.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets368.94M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.19
Change-$0.22 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
CSSZX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. SSGSX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. CSSZX (369M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: CSSZX (0.67) vs SSGSX (0.49). CSSZX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: CSSZX (14 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.05). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSSZX (7.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: CSSZX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.64 vs. CSSZX (-10.86). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.41 vs. SSGSX (31.97).
| CSSZX | SSGSX | CSSZX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.26 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.955 | -4.609 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 369M | 5.96B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.49 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.86 | -7.64 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.12 | -7.86 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.41 | 31.97 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.75 | 16.91 | -58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers