Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs WCMFX
CSSZX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs WCMFX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$21.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$11.45
Change-$0.05 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.2M
CSSZX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. WCMFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Buy and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSZX has more cash in the bank: 371M vs. WCMFX (60.2M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: CSSZX (0.66) vs WCMFX (0.00). CSSZX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: CSSZX (15 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.05). WCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. CSSZX (7.00). CSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: CSSZX (2000) vs WCMFX (100000). CSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.03 vs. WCMFX (-12.48). WCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.96 vs. CSSZX (18.54).
| CSSZX | WCMFX | CSSZX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.90 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.45 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.902 | -4.007 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 371M | 60.2M | 616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.03 | -12.48 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.98 | 6.98 | -86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.54 | 25.96 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement