Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSZX vs WCMJX
CSSZX vs WCMJX Comparison
Open Charts CSSZX vs WCMJX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Inst
Price$22.58
Change+$0.35 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.97M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Investor
Price$3.25
Change+$0.02 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.37M
CSSZX vs WCMJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSZX vs. WCMJX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSZX is a Buy and WCMJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSZX has more cash in the bank: 363M vs. WCMJX (5.37M). CSSZX pays higher dividends than WCMJX: CSSZX (0.63) vs WCMJX (0.00). CSSZX was incepted earlier than WCMJX: CSSZX (15 years) vs WCMJX (6 years). WCMJX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CSSZX (1.04). CSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. WCMJX (15.00). WCMJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSZX: WCMJX (1000) vs CSSZX (2000). CSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.12 vs. WCMJX (-77.68). CSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.77 vs. WCMJX (-67.57).
| CSSZX | WCMJX | CSSZX / WCMJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.15 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.70 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.007 | -72.581 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 363M | 5.37M | 6,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.12 | -77.68 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.45 | -68.85 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.77 | -67.57 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement