CSTAF
Price
$11.73
Change
-$0.57 (-4.63%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FGMC
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
48.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSTAF vs FGMC

Header iconCSTAF vs FGMC Comparison
Open Charts CSTAF vs FGMCBanner chart's image
Constellation Acquisition Corp I
Price$11.73
Change-$0.57 (-4.63%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FG Merger II
Price$9.90
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$4.1K
Capitalization48.96M
CSTAF vs FGMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSTAF vs. FGMC commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTAF is a Hold and FGMC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CSTAF: $11.73 vs. FGMC: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: CSTAF and FGMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSTAF: 21% vs. FGMC: 15%
Market capitalization -- CSTAF: $0 vs. FGMC: $48.96M
CSTAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. FGMC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $48.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSTAF and FGMC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSTAF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSTAF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FGMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSTAF is a better buy in the short-term than FGMC.

Price Growth

CSTAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -4.63% price change this week, while FGMC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSTAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

FGMC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.88% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSTAFFGMCCSTAF / FGMC
CapitalizationN/A49M-
EBITDAN/A-2.41M-
Gain YTD0.256N/A-
P/E RatioN/A1250.00-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A6.28K-
Total DebtN/A845K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSTAFFGMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
8%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
23%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
27%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNSP8.820.23
+2.68%
CNS Pharmaceuticals Inc
SSB98.500.60
+0.61%
SouthState Corp
EH19.990.10
+0.50%
EHang Holdings Limited
CDRO8.450.02
+0.24%
Codere Online Luxembourg SA
CVX154.84-0.99
-0.64%
Chevron Corp

CSTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSTAF and PORT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSTAF and PORT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTAF
1D Price
Change %
CSTAF100%
N/A
PORT - CSTAF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGMCU - CSTAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGMC - CSTAF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
AACI - CSTAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEEP - CSTAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

FGMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGMC has been loosely correlated with IRRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGMC jumps, then IRRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMC
1D Price
Change %
FGMC100%
+0.34%
IRRX - FGMC
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEEP - FGMC
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
CSTAF - FGMC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - FGMC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFJKU - FGMC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More