CSTUF
Price
$11.49
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
RTGC
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.01 (-2.70%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSTUF vs RTGC

Header iconCSTUF vs RTGC Comparison
Open Charts CSTUF vs RTGCBanner chart's image
Constellation Acquisition Corp I
Price$11.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Ridder Titan Genesis
Price$0.36
Change-$0.01 (-2.70%)
Volume$537
Capitalization2.41M
CSTUF vs RTGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSTUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSTUF vs. RTGC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTUF is a Hold and RTGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CSTUF: $11.49 vs. RTGC: $0.36)
Brand notoriety: CSTUF and RTGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSTUF: 203% vs. RTGC: 33%
Market capitalization -- CSTUF: $0 vs. RTGC: $2.41M
CSTUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. RTGC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $2.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.89M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSTUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRTGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSTUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RTGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSTUF is a better buy in the long-term than RTGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSTUF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTGC’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSTUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RTGC’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSTUF is a better buy in the short-term than RTGC.

Price Growth

CSTUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RTGC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.12% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTGC YTD gains are higher at: 8.108 vs. CSTUF (0.789).
CSTUFRTGCCSTUF / RTGC
CapitalizationN/A2.41M-
EBITDA-1.24MN/A-
Gain YTD0.7898.10810%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash4.91KN/A-
Total Debt5.09MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTGC: Fundamental Ratings
RTGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSTUFRTGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
3%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSTUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDT.X0.0241920.000142
+0.59%
Measurable Data Token cryptocurrency
BEAR.XN/AN/A
-NaN%
Bear Inu cryptocurrency
SEI.X0.2914910.012121
+4.34%
Sei cryptocurrency
CTSI.X0.0759140.001601
+2.15%
Cartesi cryptocurrency
YFI.X5241.72500073.006836
+1.41%
yearn.finance cryptocurrency

CSTUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSTUF and PORT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSTUF and PORT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSTUF
1D Price
Change %
CSTUF100%
N/A
PORT - CSTUF
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.31%
PORTU - CSTUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGAAF - CSTUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETAU - CSTUF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - CSTUF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RTGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTGC and WHLT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTGC and WHLT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTGC
1D Price
Change %
RTGC100%
N/A
WHLT - RTGC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVAC - RTGC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKLU - RTGC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORTU - RTGC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QETAU - RTGC
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More