Ad is loading...
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.20
Change-$0.10 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.88M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.68
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.34M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 834M vs. RGFTX (347M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.01) vs CSUAX (2.07). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.21) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. CSUAX (12.63). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.29 vs. RGFTX (44.00).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.067 | 7.759 | 78% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 347M | 240% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 3.01 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.63 | 15.18 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.55 | 9.90 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.29 | 44.00 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers