Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.92
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.84M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.42
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets348.52M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. RGFTX (349M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.01) vs CSUAX (2.01). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.93 vs. CSUAX (2.06). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.47 vs. RGFTX (18.09).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.207 | 17.810 | 57% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 349M | 278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 3.01 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 10.93 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.54 | 32.42 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.47 | 18.09 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers