Ad is loading...
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.03
Change-$0.05 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets883.69M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets345.24M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 884M vs. RGFTX (345M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.01) vs CSUAX (2.07). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.21) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.07 vs. CSUAX (12.27). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.41 vs. RGFTX (30.34).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.107 | 8.092 | 63% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 884M | 345M | 256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 3.01 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | 16.07 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.64 | 11.79 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.41 | 30.34 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers