Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$24.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets904.27M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.23
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.37M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 904M vs. RGFTX (363M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (2.69) vs CSUAX (2.03). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.41 vs. CSUAX (9.75). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.43 vs. RGFTX (19.03).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.202 | 13.419 | 54% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 363M | 249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 2.69 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.75 | 16.41 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.31 | 15.92 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.43 | 19.03 | 165% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers