Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUAX vs RGFTX
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUAX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure A
Price$25.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets961.1M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.55
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.6M
CSUAX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUAX vs. RGFTX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUAX is a Buy and RGFTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUAX has more cash in the bank: 961M vs. RGFTX (354M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUAX: RGFTX (3.06) vs CSUAX (1.99). CSUAX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUAX (21 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). RGFTX (1.24) and CSUAX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . CSUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUAX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.58 vs. CSUAX (3.82). CSUAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.30 vs. RGFTX (27.47).
| CSUAX | RGFTX | CSUAX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.153 | 19.506 | 62% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 961M | 354M | 271% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 3.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.82 | 13.58 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.66 | 49.02 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.30 | 27.47 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement