CSV
Price
$43.93
Change
-$1.02 (-2.27%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
409.42M
46 days until earnings call
MED
Price
$12.98
Change
-$0.18 (-1.37%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
417.52M
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSV vs MED

Header iconCSV vs MED Comparison
Open Charts CSV vs MEDBanner chart's image
Carriage Services
Price$43.93
Change-$1.02 (-2.27%)
Volume$66.64K
Capitalization409.42M
Medifast
Price$12.98
Change-$0.18 (-1.37%)
Volume$155.71K
Capitalization417.52M
CSV vs MED Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSV vs. MED commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSV is a Buy and MED is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (CSV: $43.93 vs. MED: $12.98)
Brand notoriety: CSV and MED are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSV: 58% vs. MED: 71%
Market capitalization -- CSV: $409.42M vs. MED: $417.52M
CSV [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $409.42M. MED’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $417.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMED’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MED’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSV is a better buy in the long-term than MED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MED’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MED’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MED is a better buy in the short-term than CSV.

Price Growth

CSV (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -2.44% price change this week, while MED (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -3.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

MED is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-3.84% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MED($418M) and CSV($409M) have the same market capitalization . CSV has higher P/E ratio than MED: CSV (12.39) vs MED (4.12). CSV YTD gains are higher at: 10.851 vs. MED (-26.334). MED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. CSV (105M). MED has more cash in the bank: 150M vs. CSV (1.52M). MED has less debt than CSV: MED (22M) vs CSV (605M). MED has higher revenues than CSV: MED (1.07B) vs CSV (383M).
CSVMEDCSV / MED
Capitalization409M418M98%
EBITDA105M140M75%
Gain YTD10.851-26.334-41%
P/E Ratio12.394.12301%
Revenue383M1.07B36%
Total Cash1.52M150M1%
Total Debt605M22M2,750%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSV vs MED: Fundamental Ratings
CSV
MED
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
4190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
501
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MED's Valuation (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSV (44) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSV’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MED (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's SMR Rating (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MED (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than MED’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MED (63) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to MED’s over the last 12 months.

MED's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSV (50) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MED’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSVMED
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MED
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGLCX14.04-0.06
-0.43%
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureC
KGIIX16.18-0.12
-0.74%
Kopernik International I
TGIHX14.80-0.19
-1.27%
Nuveen Core Equity I
GTSYX29.84-0.44
-1.45%
Invesco Small Cap Growth Y
GEBSX10.89-0.16
-1.45%
Goldman Sachs ESG Em Mkts Eq R6

CSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSV has been loosely correlated with SCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSV jumps, then SCI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSV
1D Price
Change %
CSV100%
-2.27%
SCI - CSV
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
TNL - CSV
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.88%
NCLH - CSV
38%
Loosely correlated
-5.02%
CCL - CSV
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
BKNG - CSV
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
More