CSV
Price
$42.74
Change
-$0.56 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
670.95M
52 days until earnings call
SCI
Price
$77.82
Change
-$0.79 (-1.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.91B
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSV vs SCI

Header iconCSV vs SCI Comparison
Open Charts CSV vs SCIBanner chart's image
Carriage Services
Price$42.74
Change-$0.56 (-1.29%)
Volume$88K
Capitalization670.95M
Service
Price$77.82
Change-$0.79 (-1.00%)
Volume$958.47K
Capitalization10.91B
CSV vs SCI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSV vs. SCI commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSV is a Hold and SCI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CSV: $42.74 vs. SCI: $77.82)
Brand notoriety: CSV and SCI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSV: 93% vs. SCI: 99%
Market capitalization -- CSV: $670.95M vs. SCI: $10.91B
CSV [@Personnel Services] is valued at $670.95M. SCI’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $10.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCI is a better buy in the long-term than CSV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SCI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCI is a better buy in the short-term than CSV.

Price Growth

CSV (@Personnel Services) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while SCI (@Personnel Services) price change was -1.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +216.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSV is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

SCI is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-6.56% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCI($10.9B) has a higher market cap than CSV($671M). SCI has higher P/E ratio than CSV: SCI (21.15) vs CSV (12.87). CSV YTD gains are higher at: 8.117 vs. SCI (-1.715). SCI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.3B vs. CSV (126M). SCI has more cash in the bank: 255M vs. CSV (1.4M). CSV has less debt than SCI: CSV (540M) vs SCI (5.04B). SCI has higher revenues than CSV: SCI (4.25B) vs CSV (408M).
CSVSCICSV / SCI
Capitalization671M10.9B6%
EBITDA126M1.3B10%
Gain YTD8.117-1.715-473%
P/E Ratio12.8721.1561%
Revenue408M4.25B10%
Total Cash1.4M255M1%
Total Debt540M5.04B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSV vs SCI: Fundamental Ratings
CSV
SCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6775
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6626
SMR RATING
1..100
3827
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5760
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8361
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSV's Valuation (29) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SCI (51). This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.

SCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSV (66). This means that SCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSV’s over the last 12 months.

SCI's SMR Rating (27) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CSV (38). This means that SCI’s stock grew similarly to CSV’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SCI (60). This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.

SCI's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CSV (83). This means that SCI’s stock grew similarly to CSV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSVSCI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBA28.860.67
+2.38%
KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF
FWD93.700.64
+0.69%
AB Disruptors ETF
IBMS26.010.09
+0.35%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Mun Bd ETF
OVT22.320.01
+0.03%
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
DDWWF5.35N/A
N/A
Dividend Growth Split Corp.