Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RMFCX
CSVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
Price$40.70
Change+$0.46 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
CSVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CSVZX (2.53B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CSVZX (1.65) vs RMFCX (1.24). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CSVZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CSVZX (0.83). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RMFCX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. RMFCX (6.41). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 81.98 vs. RMFCX (63.20).
| CSVZX | RMFCX | CSVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.91 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.91 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.224 | 13.245 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.24 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 6.41 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.84 | 42.10 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.98 | 63.20 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.80 | 103.62 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement