Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RWEBX
CSVZX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RWEBX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
Price$41.28
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.54
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
CSVZX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. CSVZX (2.61B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CSVZX (1.58) vs RWEBX (0.76). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CSVZX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CSVZX (0.82). RWEBX (29.00) and CSVZX (28.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RWEBX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.88 vs. RWEBX (3.20). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 64.06 vs. RWEBX (39.61).
| CSVZX | RWEBX | CSVZX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.06 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.06 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.894 | 7.797 | 242% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.61B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.76 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.88 | 3.20 | 402% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.26 | 26.70 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.06 | 39.61 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.36 | 66.23 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement