CSWC
Price
$23.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.46B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAIN
Price
$53.47
Change
+$0.35 (+0.66%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.97B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSWC vs MAIN

CSWC vs MAIN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWC vs. MAIN commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a Hold and MAIN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CSWC: $23.45 vs. MAIN: $53.47)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and MAIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 64% vs. MAIN: 59%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.46B vs. MAIN: $4.97B
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.46B. MAIN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MAIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the long-term than CSWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAIN is a better buy in the short-term than CSWC.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while MAIN (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

MAIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAIN($4.97B) has a higher market cap than CSWC($1.46B). CSWC has higher P/E ratio than MAIN: CSWC (12.35) vs MAIN (11.26). CSWC YTD gains are higher at: 12.828 vs. MAIN (-7.481). CSWC has less debt than MAIN: CSWC (1.13B) vs MAIN (2.53B). MAIN has higher revenues than CSWC: MAIN (526M) vs CSWC (151M).
CSWCMAINCSWC / MAIN
Capitalization1.46B4.97B29%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.828-7.481-171%
P/E Ratio12.3511.26110%
Revenue151M526M29%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.13B2.53B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs MAIN: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
MAIN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2381
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3027
SMR RATING
1..100
5636
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7448
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAIN's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (15) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as MAIN (57) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to MAIN’s over the last 12 months.

MAIN's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (74) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MAIN’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCMAIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHNY7.960.02
+0.25%
MicroSectors™ Gold 3X Leveraged ETN
STOX30.730.03
+0.09%
Horizon Core Equity ETF
VTWO119.63N/A
N/A
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
TAFM25.14-0.01
-0.02%
AB Tax-Aware Intermediate Municipal ETF
GHYB44.37-0.07
-0.17%
Goldman Sachs Access Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF

CSWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with SLRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then SLRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWC
1D Price
Change %
CSWC100%
N/A
SLRC - CSWC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
ARCC - CSWC
71%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
PFLT - CSWC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
PNNT - CSWC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
MAIN - CSWC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
More

MAIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIN has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAIN jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIN
1D Price
Change %
MAIN100%
+0.66%
ARCC - MAIN
70%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
CSWC - MAIN
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HTGC - MAIN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
PFLT - MAIN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
BXSL - MAIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
More