CSWYF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
831.58M
HAWPF
Price
$10.62
Change
+$1.22 (+12.98%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSWYF vs HAWPF

Header iconCSWYF vs HAWPF Comparison
Open Charts CSWYF vs HAWPFBanner chart's image
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group
Price$1.00
Change+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Volume$200
Capitalization831.58M
Haw Par
Price$10.62
Change+$1.22 (+12.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.39B
CSWYF vs HAWPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAWPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWYF vs. HAWPF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWYF is a Hold and HAWPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWYF: $1.00 vs. HAWPF: $10.62)
Brand notoriety: CSWYF and HAWPF are both not notable
CSWYF represents the Pharmaceuticals: Generic, while HAWPF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWYF: 100% vs. HAWPF: 39%
Market capitalization -- CSWYF: $831.58M vs. HAWPF: $2.39B
CSWYF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $831.58M. HAWPF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $2.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $68.6B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $656.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.84B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $88.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAWPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAWPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAWPF is a better buy in the long-term than CSWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAWPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HAWPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CSWYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HAWPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +68.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.63%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+1.25% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-1.84% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAWPF($2.39B) has a higher market cap than CSWYF($832M). HAWPF has higher P/E ratio than CSWYF: HAWPF (12.07) vs CSWYF (4.88). HAWPF YTD gains are higher at: 32.750 vs. CSWYF (0.000).
CSWYFHAWPFCSWYF / HAWPF
Capitalization832M2.39B35%
EBITDAN/A277M-
Gain YTD0.00032.750-
P/E Ratio4.8812.0740%
RevenueN/A253M-
Total CashN/A3.95B-
Total DebtN/A34M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAWPF: Fundamental Ratings
HAWPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWYFHAWPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAWPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THCRX30.920.54
+1.78%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth R3
MFRLX50.78N/A
N/A
MFS Research R1
CAPRX9.20N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Capital Income R
EMRSX19.45N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Mkts Rsrch Enh Eq R6
FSMCX16.95-0.04
-0.24%
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Institutional

CSWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSWYF and HAWPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSWYF and HAWPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWYF
1D Price
Change %
CSWYF100%
N/A
HAWPF - CSWYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNYNF - CSWYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIRA - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
SCLX - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
LYPHF - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HAWPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAWPF and CSWYF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAWPF and CSWYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAWPF
1D Price
Change %
HAWPF100%
N/A
CSWYF - HAWPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RHHVF - HAWPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
BMY - HAWPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
GLAXF - HAWPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPHLY - HAWPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
More