CSWYF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
519.41M
HAWPF
Price
$10.62
Change
+$1.22 (+12.98%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSWYF vs HAWPF

Header iconCSWYF vs HAWPF Comparison
Open Charts CSWYF vs HAWPFBanner chart's image
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group
Price$1.00
Change+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Volume$200
Capitalization519.41M
Haw Par
Price$10.62
Change+$1.22 (+12.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.62B
CSWYF vs HAWPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HAWPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWYF vs. HAWPF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWYF is a Buy and HAWPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWYF: $1.00 vs. HAWPF: $10.62)
Brand notoriety: CSWYF and HAWPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWYF: 100% vs. HAWPF: 30%
Market capitalization -- CSWYF: $519.41M vs. HAWPF: $1.62B
CSWYF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $519.41M. HAWPF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAWPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAWPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAWPF is a better buy in the long-term than CSWYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HAWPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HAWPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CSWYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HAWPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +12.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-0.43% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAWPF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than CSWYF($519M). HAWPF has higher P/E ratio than CSWYF: HAWPF (13.91) vs CSWYF (9.64). HAWPF YTD gains are higher at: 32.750 vs. CSWYF (0.000). HAWPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. CSWYF (115M). HAWPF has more cash in the bank: 3.09B vs. CSWYF (643M). CSWYF has less debt than HAWPF: CSWYF (2.93M) vs HAWPF (12.9M). CSWYF has higher revenues than HAWPF: CSWYF (457M) vs HAWPF (171M).
CSWYFHAWPFCSWYF / HAWPF
Capitalization519M1.62B32%
EBITDA115M149M77%
Gain YTD0.00032.750-
P/E Ratio9.6413.9169%
Revenue457M171M267%
Total Cash643M3.09B21%
Total Debt2.93M12.9M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAWPF: Fundamental Ratings
HAWPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWYFHAWPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HAWPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJRCX8.60N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq C
MMIEX16.00N/A
N/A
MM S&P 500® Index Svc
AKREX71.45N/A
N/A
Akre Focus Retail
CFGIX18.84N/A
N/A
Cromwell Foresight Global Infras Instl
KDHIX52.64N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend Inst

CSWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSWYF and HAWPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSWYF and HAWPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWYF
1D Price
Change %
CSWYF100%
N/A
HAWPF - CSWYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNYNF - CSWYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
MIRA - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.20%
SCLX - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.44%
LYPHF - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HAWPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAWPF and CSWYF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAWPF and CSWYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAWPF
1D Price
Change %
HAWPF100%
N/A
CSWYF - HAWPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RHHVF - HAWPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
BMY - HAWPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
GLAXF - HAWPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPHLY - HAWPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More