Ad is loading...
CSWYF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
HAWPF
Price
$8.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

CSWYF vs HAWPF

Header iconCSWYF vs HAWPF Comparison
Open Charts CSWYF vs HAWPFBanner chart's image
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group
Price$1.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Haw Par
Price$8.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
CapitalizationN/A
CSWYF vs HAWPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWYF vs. HAWPF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWYF is a Hold and HAWPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CSWYF: $1.00 vs. HAWPF: $8.35)
Brand notoriety: CSWYF and HAWPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWYF: 100% vs. HAWPF: 182%
Market capitalization -- CSWYF: $519.41M vs. HAWPF: $1.62B
CSWYF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $519.41M. HAWPF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAWPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAWPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSWYF is a better buy in the long-term than HAWPF.

Price Growth

CSWYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HAWPF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-4.55% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAWPF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than CSWYF($519M). HAWPF has higher P/E ratio than CSWYF: HAWPF (13.91) vs CSWYF (9.64). HAWPF YTD gains are higher at: 12.686 vs. CSWYF (8.505). HAWPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. CSWYF (115M). HAWPF has more cash in the bank: 3.09B vs. CSWYF (643M). CSWYF has less debt than HAWPF: CSWYF (2.93M) vs HAWPF (12.9M). CSWYF has higher revenues than HAWPF: CSWYF (457M) vs HAWPF (171M).
CSWYFHAWPFCSWYF / HAWPF
Capitalization519M1.62B32%
EBITDA115M149M77%
Gain YTD8.50512.68667%
P/E Ratio9.6413.9169%
Revenue457M171M267%
Total Cash643M3.09B21%
Total Debt2.93M12.9M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAWPF: Fundamental Ratings
HAWPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GHACX33.09-0.14
-0.42%
VanEck Global Resources Fund C
FGDAX24.67-0.11
-0.44%
Fidelity Advisor Gold A
JIVZX32.47-0.17
-0.52%
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val R2
AAEMX10.82-0.08
-0.73%
Alger Emerging Markets A
FIKHX140.65-3.37
-2.34%
Fidelity Advisor Technology Z

CSWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSWYF and HAWPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSWYF and HAWPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWYF
1D Price
Change %
CSWYF100%
N/A
HAWPF - CSWYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNYNF - CSWYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIRA - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
SCLX - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.31%
LYPHF - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HAWPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAWPF and CSWYF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAWPF and CSWYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAWPF
1D Price
Change %
HAWPF100%
N/A
CSWYF - HAWPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RHHVF - HAWPF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
BMY - HAWPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.90%
GLAXF - HAWPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
OPHLY - HAWPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More