CSWYF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
LYPHF
Price
$0.34
Change
+$0.03 (+9.68%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CSWYF vs LYPHF

Header iconCSWYF vs LYPHF Comparison
Open Charts CSWYF vs LYPHFBanner chart's image
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group
Price$1.00
Change+$0.07 (+7.53%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Luye Pharma Group
Price$0.34
Change+$0.03 (+9.68%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
CSWYF vs LYPHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWYF vs. LYPHF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWYF is a Buy and LYPHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CSWYF: $1.00 vs. LYPHF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: CSWYF and LYPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWYF: 100% vs. LYPHF: 196%
Market capitalization -- CSWYF: $519.41M vs. LYPHF: $1.76B
CSWYF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $519.41M. LYPHF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $1.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYPHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LYPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSWYF is a better buy in the long-term than LYPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWYF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSWYF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CSWYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LYPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-2.43% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYPHF($1.76B) has a higher market cap than CSWYF($519M). LYPHF has higher P/E ratio than CSWYF: LYPHF (19.23) vs CSWYF (9.64). CSWYF YTD gains are higher at: 8.505 vs. LYPHF (-19.734). LYPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 907M vs. CSWYF (115M). LYPHF has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. CSWYF (643M). CSWYF has less debt than LYPHF: CSWYF (2.93M) vs LYPHF (9.49B). LYPHF has higher revenues than CSWYF: LYPHF (5.2B) vs CSWYF (457M).
CSWYFLYPHFCSWYF / LYPHF
Capitalization519M1.76B30%
EBITDA115M907M13%
Gain YTD8.505-19.734-43%
P/E Ratio9.6419.2350%
Revenue457M5.2B9%
Total Cash643M5.51B12%
Total Debt2.93M9.49B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWYFLYPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSWYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIFAX7.91-0.02
-0.25%
SEI Multi-Asset Inflation Mgd F (SIMT)
WELIX9.51-0.03
-0.31%
William Blair Emerging Mkts Ldrs R6
MYSPX64.26-0.25
-0.39%
NYLI S&P 500 Index Investor Class
NYVCX20.29-0.23
-1.12%
Davis NY Venture C
RYAZX213.80-3.15
-1.45%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value H

CSWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSWYF and HAWPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSWYF and HAWPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWYF
1D Price
Change %
CSWYF100%
N/A
HAWPF - CSWYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNYNF - CSWYF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.45%
MIRA - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
SCLX - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYPHF - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LYPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYPHF and OGN have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYPHF and OGN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYPHF
1D Price
Change %
LYPHF100%
N/A
OGN - LYPHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
SNYNF - LYPHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+7.45%
CSWYF - LYPHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRBCF - LYPHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JCRRF - LYPHF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More