Ad is loading...
CSWYF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
MIRA
Price
$1.54
Change
+$0.04 (+2.67%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSWYF vs MIRA

Header iconCSWYF vs MIRA Comparison
Open Charts CSWYF vs MIRABanner chart's image
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group
Price$1.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
MIRA Pharmaceuticals
Price$1.54
Change+$0.04 (+2.67%)
Volume$244.45K
CapitalizationN/A
CSWYF vs MIRA Comparison Chart
Loading...
MIRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWYF vs. MIRA commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWYF is a Hold and MIRA is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CSWYF: $1.00 vs. MIRA: $1.54)
Brand notoriety: CSWYF and MIRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Major industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWYF: 100% vs. MIRA: 14%
Market capitalization -- CSWYF: $519.41M vs. MIRA: $16.26M
CSWYF [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] is valued at $519.41M. MIRA’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] market capitalization is $16.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry ranges from $739.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Major] industry is $86.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMIRA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MIRA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSWYF is a better buy in the long-term than MIRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MIRA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MIRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CSWYF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MIRA (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

MIRA is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-4.55% weekly)

The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSWYF($519M) has a higher market cap than MIRA($16.3M). MIRA YTD gains are higher at: 46.667 vs. CSWYF (8.505). CSWYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 115M vs. MIRA (-6.82M). CSWYF has more cash in the bank: 643M vs. MIRA (5.87M). MIRA has less debt than CSWYF: MIRA (109K) vs CSWYF (2.93M). CSWYF has higher revenues than MIRA: CSWYF (457M) vs MIRA (0).
CSWYFMIRACSWYF / MIRA
Capitalization519M16.3M3,184%
EBITDA115M-6.82M-1,687%
Gain YTD8.50546.66718%
P/E Ratio9.64N/A-
Revenue457M0-
Total Cash643M5.87M10,958%
Total Debt2.93M109K2,692%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MIRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MIRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
METCB10.860.23
+2.16%
Ramaco Resources
ABCB69.630.01
+0.01%
Ameris Bancorp
OGI1.44-0.06
-4.00%
Organigram Holdings
CELH25.66-1.27
-4.72%
Celsius Holdings
TRAW4.99-0.59
-10.59%
Traws Pharma Inc

CSWYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSWYF and HAWPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSWYF and HAWPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWYF
1D Price
Change %
CSWYF100%
N/A
HAWPF - CSWYF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNYNF - CSWYF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MIRA - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
SCLX - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-10.31%
LYPHF - CSWYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MIRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIRA and RHHBF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIRA and RHHBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIRA
1D Price
Change %
MIRA100%
+2.67%
RHHBF - MIRA
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
OGN - MIRA
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
RHHVF - MIRA
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
JNJ - MIRA
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
SNYNF - MIRA
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More