CSXXY
Price
$52.74
Change
-$1.56 (-2.87%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
9.89B
NAPRF
Price
$336.86
Change
+$9.16 (+2.80%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
51.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSXXY vs NAPRF

Header iconCSXXY vs NAPRF Comparison
Open Charts CSXXY vs NAPRFBanner chart's image
CAR GROUP
Price$52.74
Change-$1.56 (-2.87%)
Volume$293
Capitalization9.89B
Naspers
Price$336.86
Change+$9.16 (+2.80%)
Volume$45
Capitalization51.35B
CSXXY vs NAPRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSXXY vs. NAPRF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSXXY is a Hold and NAPRF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CSXXY: $52.74 vs. NAPRF: $336.86)
Brand notoriety: CSXXY and NAPRF are both not notable
CSXXY represents the Internet Software/Services, while NAPRF is part of the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSXXY: 10% vs. NAPRF: 126%
Market capitalization -- CSXXY: $9.89B vs. NAPRF: $51.35B
CSXXY [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $9.89B. NAPRF’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $51.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.58T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.44T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $76.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $49.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSXXY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAPRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSXXY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAPRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAPRF is a better buy in the long-term than CSXXY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSXXY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAPRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSXXY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NAPRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAPRF is a better buy in the short-term than CSXXY.

Price Growth

CSXXY (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -1.22% price change this week, while NAPRF (@Internet Retail) price change was +2.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +7.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +240.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+1.37% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

@Internet Retail (+7.33% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAPRF($51.3B) has a higher market cap than CSXXY($9.89B). CSXXY has higher P/E ratio than NAPRF: CSXXY (55.63) vs NAPRF (11.20). NAPRF YTD gains are higher at: 56.250 vs. CSXXY (19.026). NAPRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.64B vs. CSXXY (632M). NAPRF has more cash in the bank: 18.4B vs. CSXXY (289M). CSXXY has less debt than NAPRF: CSXXY (1.41B) vs NAPRF (16.9B). NAPRF has higher revenues than CSXXY: NAPRF (6.87B) vs CSXXY (1.18B).
CSXXYNAPRFCSXXY / NAPRF
Capitalization9.89B51.3B19%
EBITDA632M8.64B7%
Gain YTD19.02656.25034%
P/E Ratio55.6311.20497%
Revenue1.18B6.87B17%
Total Cash289M18.4B2%
Total Debt1.41B16.9B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSXXY vs NAPRF: Fundamental Ratings
CSXXY
NAPRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9735
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
273
SMR RATING
1..100
9118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5166
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSXXY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NAPRF (44). This means that CSXXY’s stock grew similarly to NAPRF’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CSXXY (27). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to CSXXY’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSXXY (91). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSXXY’s over the last 12 months.

NAPRF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CSXXY (46). This means that NAPRF’s stock grew similarly to CSXXY’s over the last 12 months.

CSXXY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as NAPRF (66). This means that CSXXY’s stock grew similarly to NAPRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSXXYNAPRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSXXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAPRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SD11.84-0.03
-0.25%
SandRidge Energy
OI12.99-0.04
-0.31%
O-I Glass
WTRG39.51-0.15
-0.38%
Essential Utilities
NTRB6.47-0.07
-1.00%
Nutriband
NDRA4.09-0.05
-1.25%
ENDRA Life Sciences Inc

CSXXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSXXY and SKLTY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSXXY and SKLTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSXXY
1D Price
Change %
CSXXY100%
-2.87%
SKLTY - CSXXY
24%
Poorly correlated
+11.34%
AREN - CSXXY
14%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
NAPRF - CSXXY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHLLF - CSXXY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKST - CSXXY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NAPRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAPRF and TCTZF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAPRF and TCTZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAPRF
1D Price
Change %
NAPRF100%
N/A
TCTZF - NAPRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
TCEHY - NAPRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
RCRUY - NAPRF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
ONFO - NAPRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
PROSY - NAPRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More