Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs PEMGX
CTAGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs PEMGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$16.91
Change+$0.26 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.22M
CTAGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. CTAGX (35.2M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: CTAGX (2.07) vs PEMGX (0.00). CTAGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CTAGX (6 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CTAGX (5%) vs CTAGX (5%). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: PEMGX (1000) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. PEMGX (-6.45). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 29.16 vs. PEMGX (25.57).
| CTAGX | PEMGX | CTAGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.180 | -0.680 | -2,084% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 86% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.2M | 30.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -6.45 | -137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.78 | 32.28 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.16 | 25.57 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.67 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement