Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs PEMGX
CTAGX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs PEMGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.19
Change-$0.25 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.09M
CTAGX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. PEMGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.9B vs. CTAGX (36.1M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: CTAGX (2.15) vs PEMGX (0.00). CTAGX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: CTAGX (6 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CTAGX (5%) vs CTAGX (5%). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: PEMGX (1000) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.53 vs. PEMGX (-3.03). PEMGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.03 vs. CTAGX (32.19).
| CTAGX | PEMGX | CTAGX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.070 | 2.206 | 729% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 86% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 31.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.53 | -3.03 | -744% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.94 | 48.57 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.19 | 35.03 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement