Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs PMAQX
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.19
Change-$0.25 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.09M
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.9B vs. CTAGX (36.1M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than PMAQX: CTAGX (2.15) vs PMAQX (0.19). CTAGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTAGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: PMAQX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.53 vs. PMAQX (-2.59). PMAQX return over 5 years is better than : 38.23 vs. CTAGX (32.19).
| CTAGX | PMAQX | CTAGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.59 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.070 | 2.442 | 658% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 31.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.19 | 1,150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.53 | -2.59 | -870% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.94 | 50.62 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.19 | 38.23 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement