Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs PMAQX
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs PMAQX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$16.91
Change+$0.26 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.22M
CTAGX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. PMAQX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 30.8B vs. CTAGX (35.2M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than PMAQX: CTAGX (2.07) vs PMAQX (0.20). CTAGX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: CTAGX (6 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). PMAQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: PMAQX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. PMAQX (-6.04). CTAGX (29.16) and PMAQX (28.54) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CTAGX | PMAQX | CTAGX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.59 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.59 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.180 | -0.426 | -3,331% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.2M | 30.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 0.20 | 1,064% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -6.04 | -147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.78 | 34.07 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.16 | 28.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers