Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTASX vs NRGSX
CTASX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTASX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
Price$42.96
Change+$0.53 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.39M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
CTASX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTASX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTASX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. CTASX (530M). CTASX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTASX (1.96) vs NRGSX (0.07). CTASX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTASX (12 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTASX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTASX: NRGSX (0) vs CTASX (2500). CTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.74 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). CTASX return over 5 years is better than : 36.63 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| CTASX | NRGSX | CTASX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.74 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.74 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.608 | -7.590 | -245% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 8.19B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 0.07 | 2,960% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.74 | -14.62 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.66 | -4.10 | -1,823% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.63 | -11.01 | -333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 167.45 | 3.70 | 4,530% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement