Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTASX vs WCMNX
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts CTASX vs WCMNX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
Price$36.70
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets407.3M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.84M
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTASX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTASX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTASX has more cash in the bank: 407M vs. WCMNX (42.8M). CTASX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: CTASX (2.45) vs WCMNX (0.00). CTASX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: CTASX (11 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than CTASX (1.35). CTASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTASX: WCMNX (1000) vs CTASX (2500). CTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.64 vs. WCMNX (-1.48). CTASX return over 5 years is better than : 53.41 vs. WCMNX (12.35).
| CTASX | WCMNX | CTASX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.04 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.325 | -5.359 | -25% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 407M | 42.8M | 951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | -1.48 | -1,262% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.22 | 11.82 | 315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.41 | 12.35 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement