Ad is loading...
CTASX vs WCMNX
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts CTASX vs WCMNX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
Price$34.81
Change+$0.21 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.73M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$11.58
Change-$0.06 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.98M
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTASX vs. WCMNX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTASX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTASX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. WCMNX (42M). CTASX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: CTASX (2.72) vs WCMNX (0.00). CTASX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: CTASX (11 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than CTASX (1.35). CTASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTASX: WCMNX (1000) vs CTASX (2500). CTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.12 vs. WCMNX (-7.21). CTASX return over 5 years is better than : 60.87 vs. WCMNX (20.50).
| CTASX | WCMNX | CTASX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.11 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.893 | -8.747 | 45% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 42M | 914% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.12 | -7.21 | -196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.65 | 14.20 | 328% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.87 | 20.50 | 297% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers