Ad is loading...
CTASX vs WCMNX
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts CTASX vs WCMNX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth A
Price$31.21
Change-$0.06 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.12M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$10.67
Change+$0.10 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.8M
CTASX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTASX vs. WCMNX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTASX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTASX has more cash in the bank: 343M vs. WCMNX (38.8M). CTASX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: CTASX (2.78) vs WCMNX (0.00). CTASX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: CTASX (11 years) vs WCMNX (5 years). WCMNX (2.11) is less costly to investors than CTASX (1.35). CTASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. WCMNX (48.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTASX: WCMNX (1000) vs CTASX (2500). CTASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. WCMNX (-12.50). CTASX return over 5 years is better than : 59.49 vs. WCMNX (21.77).
| CTASX | WCMNX | CTASX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.24 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 2.11 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.832 | -16.706 | 83% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343M | 38.8M | 884% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | -12.50 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.38 | -8.72 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.49 | 21.77 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.77 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...