Ad is loading...
CTCAX vs FSELX
CTCAX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CTCAX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth A
Price$71.88
Change-$5.27 (-6.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.22B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$25.03
Change-$3.01 (-10.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.48B
CTCAX vs FSELX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTCAX vs. FSELX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTCAX is a Hold and FSELX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. CTCAX (3.22B). CTCAX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTCAX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CTCAX (22 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CTCAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.65). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CTCAX (7.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTCAX: FSELX (0) vs CTCAX (2000). CTCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.63 vs. FSELX (-9.02). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 196.59 vs. CTCAX (134.43).
| CTCAX | FSELX | CTCAX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.65 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.65 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.758 | -16.223 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.22B | 16.5B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.63 | -9.02 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.68 | 34.32 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.43 | 196.59 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 311.03 | 225.62 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...