Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTCSX vs NRGSX
CTCSX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTCSX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth C
Price$43.09
Change+$0.52 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.39M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
CTCSX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. CTCSX (530M). CTCSX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTCSX (1.48) vs NRGSX (0.07). CTCSX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTCSX (4 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTCSX (2.10) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTCSX: NRGSX (0) vs CTCSX (2500). CTCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.89 vs. NRGSX (-14.62).
| CTCSX | NRGSX | CTCSX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.74 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.74 | 284% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.797 | -7.590 | -234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 8.19B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.07 | 2,238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.89 | -14.62 | -88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.77 | -4.10 | -1,728% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -11.01 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement