Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTDFX vs MBXFX
CTDFX vs MBXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. CTDFX (1.8B). CTDFX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: CTDFX (1.20) vs MBXFX (1.11). CTDFX was incepted earlier than MBXFX: CTDFX (5 years) vs MBXFX (5 years). MBXFX (3.03) is less costly to investors than CTDFX (0.83). CTDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXFX: CTDFX (250) vs MBXFX (2500). CTDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.93 vs. MBXFX (-0.64).
| CTDFX | MBXFX | CTDFX / MBXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 3.03 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 3.03 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.057 | 0.538 | 2,800% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 8.19B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | -0.64 | -2,019% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.92 | 8.07 | 681% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 38.36 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement