Ad is loading...
CTEX vs XLK
CTEX vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts CTEX vs XLK
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
Price$18.28
Change+$0.65 (+3.69%)
Volume$133
Net Assets1.46M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$217.60
Change-$0.27 (-0.12%)
Volume$3.67M
Net Assets67.06B
CTEX vs XLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTEX vs. XLK commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTEX is a Buy and XLK is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 67.1B vs. CTEX (1.46M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than CTEX: XLK (-6.252) vs CTEX (-14.691). CTEX was incepted earlier than XLK: CTEX (4 years) vs XLK (26 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CTEX (0.58). CTEX has a higher turnover XLK (19.00) vs XLK (19.00).
| CTEX | XLK | CTEX / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | -14.691 | -6.252 | 235% |
| Net Assets | 1.46M | 67.1B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.08 | 725% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 19.00 | 195% |
| Yield | 0.82 | 0.74 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| XLK | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CTEX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTEX has been loosely correlated with FLNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTEX jumps, then FLNC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTEX | 100% | N/A | ||
| FLNC - CTEX | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.98% | ||
| NXT - CTEX | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.35% | ||
| ROCK - CTEX | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| AMPS - CTEX | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GEV - CTEX | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||