CTGO
Price
$13.79
Change
-$0.17 (-1.22%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
190.62M
2 days until earnings call
RGLD
Price
$184.41
Change
+$5.69 (+3.18%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
8B
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CTGO vs RGLD

Header iconCTGO vs RGLD Comparison
Open Charts CTGO vs RGLDBanner chart's image
Contango ORE
Price$13.79
Change-$0.17 (-1.22%)
Volume$78.92K
Capitalization190.62M
Royal Gold
Price$184.41
Change+$5.69 (+3.18%)
Volume$439.47K
Capitalization8B
CTGO vs RGLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTGO vs. RGLD commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTGO is a Buy and RGLD is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CTGO: $13.79 vs. RGLD: $184.41)
Brand notoriety: CTGO and RGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTGO: 61% vs. RGLD: 72%
Market capitalization -- CTGO: $190.62M vs. RGLD: $8B
CTGO [@Precious Metals] is valued at $190.62M. RGLD’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTGO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than CTGO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTGO is a better buy in the short-term than RGLD.

Price Growth

CTGO (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.68% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTGO is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($8B) has a higher market cap than CTGO($191M). RGLD YTD gains are higher at: 40.711 vs. CTGO (37.625). RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478M vs. CTGO (-55.56M). RGLD has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. CTGO (15.5M). CTGO has less debt than RGLD: CTGO (44.7M) vs RGLD (246M). RGLD has higher revenues than CTGO: RGLD (606M) vs CTGO (0).
CTGORGLDCTGO / RGLD
Capitalization191M8B2%
EBITDA-55.56M478M-12%
Gain YTD37.62540.71192%
P/E RatioN/A33.74-
Revenue0606M-
Total Cash15.5M104M15%
Total Debt44.7M246M18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTGO vs RGLD: Fundamental Ratings
CTGO
RGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8185
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8026
SMR RATING
1..100
9864
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2063
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLD's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTGO (94) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTGO (80) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's SMR Rating (64) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTGO (98) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CTGO (42) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to CTGO’s over the last 12 months.

CTGO's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGLD (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that CTGO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTGORGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCOBX42.750.24
+0.56%
DWS International Growth S
IGRFX28.030.04
+0.14%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R6
FHUMX14.55N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes US SMID Institutional
SXPCX45.99-0.03
-0.07%
DWS S&P 500 Index C
TGVVX51.80-0.24
-0.46%
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth I

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
+3.18%
WPM - RGLD
85%
Closely correlated
+4.01%
AEM - RGLD
84%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
AGI - RGLD
80%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
FNV - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
+2.41%
EGO - RGLD
74%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More