Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTHCX vs FSELX
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$84.86
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.15B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$38.89
Change+$0.13 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.06B
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. FSELX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Buy and FSELX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. CTHCX (4.15B). CTHCX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CTHCX (22 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.62). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CTHCX (7.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTHCX: FSELX (0) vs CTHCX (2000). CTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.89 vs. FSELX (20.56). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 201.83 vs. CTHCX (95.07).
| CTHCX | FSELX | CTHCX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.822 | 15.805 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.15B | 23.1B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.89 | 20.56 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.84 | 115.41 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.07 | 201.83 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 377.20 | 417.39 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement