Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTHCX vs FSELX
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs FSELX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$75.50
Change+$0.60 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.66B
Fidelity Select Semiconductors
Price$32.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.72B
CTHCX vs FSELX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. FSELX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Buy and FSELX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSELX has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. CTHCX (3.66B). CTHCX (0.00) and FSELX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than FSELX: CTHCX (22 years) vs FSELX (40 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSELX (0.62). FSELX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. CTHCX (7.00). FSELX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTHCX: FSELX (0) vs CTHCX (2000). CTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. FSELX (-7.57). FSELX return over 5 years is better than : 160.51 vs. CTHCX (92.15).
| CTHCX | FSELX | CTHCX / FSELX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.071 | -4.452 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 18.7B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | -7.57 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.42 | 81.56 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.15 | 160.51 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 322.92 | 280.88 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers