Ad is loading...
CTHCX vs FSPTX
CTHCX vs FSPTX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs FSPTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$65.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$32.27
Change+$0.29 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.19B
CTHCX vs FSPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. FSPTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Hold and FSPTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. CTHCX (3.2B). CTHCX (0.00) and FSPTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than FSPTX: CTHCX (21 years) vs FSPTX (44 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.64). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CTHCX (7.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTHCX: FSPTX (0) vs CTHCX (2000). CTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.28 vs. FSPTX (-0.25). CTHCX return over 5 years is better than : 121.86 vs. FSPTX (92.48).
| CTHCX | FSPTX | CTHCX / FSPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.64 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.64 | 300% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.624 | -13.286 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.2B | 14.2B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.28 | -0.25 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.10 | 25.13 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.86 | 92.48 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.47 | 166.29 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...