Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTHCX vs FSPTX
CTHCX vs FSPTX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs FSPTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$75.50
Change+$0.60 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.66B
Fidelity Select Technology
Price$36.09
Change+$0.44 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.61B
CTHCX vs FSPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. FSPTX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Buy and FSPTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPTX has more cash in the bank: 15.6B vs. CTHCX (3.66B). CTHCX (0.00) and FSPTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than FSPTX: CTHCX (22 years) vs FSPTX (44 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSPTX (0.62). FSPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CTHCX (7.00). FSPTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTHCX: FSPTX (0) vs CTHCX (2000). CTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. FSPTX (4.45). CTHCX return over 5 years is better than : 92.15 vs. FSPTX (62.73).
| CTHCX | FSPTX | CTHCX / FSPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.62 | 310% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.071 | -3.335 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.66B | 15.6B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 4.45 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.42 | 70.35 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.15 | 62.73 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 322.92 | 190.35 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers