Ad is loading...
CTHCX vs PRGTX
CTHCX vs PRGTX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs PRGTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$64.53
Change+$2.28 (+3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.04B
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$18.53
Change+$0.66 (+3.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.82B
CTHCX vs PRGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. PRGTX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Buy and PRGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 3.82B vs. CTHCX (3.04B). CTHCX (0.00) and PRGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than PRGTX: CTHCX (22 years) vs PRGTX (25 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.94). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. CTHCX (7.00). CTHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGTX: CTHCX (2000) vs PRGTX (2500). PRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.12 vs. CTHCX (-1.95). CTHCX return over 5 years is better than : 78.10 vs. PRGTX (7.01).
| CTHCX | PRGTX | CTHCX / PRGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.94 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.94 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.648 | -14.334 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.04B | 3.82B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.95 | 5.12 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.38 | 19.77 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.10 | 7.01 | 1,115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.61 | 29.87 | 809% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...