Ad is loading...
CTHCX vs PRGTX
CTHCX vs PRGTX Comparison
Open Charts CTHCX vs PRGTX
Columbia Global Technology Growth C
Price$65.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2B
T. Rowe Price Global Technology
Price$18.85
Change+$0.13 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.01B
CTHCX vs PRGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTHCX vs. PRGTX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTHCX is a Hold and PRGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRGTX has more cash in the bank: 4.01B vs. CTHCX (3.2B). CTHCX (0.00) and PRGTX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTHCX was incepted earlier than PRGTX: CTHCX (21 years) vs PRGTX (25 years). CTHCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than PRGTX (0.94). PRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.40 vs. CTHCX (7.00). CTHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRGTX: CTHCX (2000) vs PRGTX (2500). PRGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. CTHCX (0.28). CTHCX return over 5 years is better than : 121.86 vs. PRGTX (33.71).
| CTHCX | PRGTX | CTHCX / PRGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.94 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.94 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.624 | -10.259 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.2B | 4.01B | 80% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.28 | 4.12 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.10 | 6.48 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.86 | 33.71 | 361% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.47 | 46.14 | 601% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...