CTJHY
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
420.45M
ETRUF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTJHY vs ETRUF

Header iconCTJHY vs ETRUF Comparison
Open Charts CTJHY vs ETRUFBanner chart's image
Citic Resources Holdings
Price$9.00
Change-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization420.45M
Etruscus Resources
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization3.74M
CTJHY vs ETRUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ETRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTJHY vs. ETRUF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTJHY is a Hold and ETRUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CTJHY: $7.67 vs. ETRUF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: CTJHY and ETRUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTJHY: 100% vs. ETRUF: 87%
Market capitalization -- CTJHY: $420.45M vs. ETRUF: $3.74M
CTJHY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $420.45M. ETRUF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTJHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileETRUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTJHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ETRUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CTJHY and ETRUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTJHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ETRUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTJHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ETRUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ETRUF is a better buy in the short-term than CTJHY.

Price Growth

CTJHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ETRUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTJHY($420M) has a higher market cap than ETRUF($3.74M). ETRUF YTD gains are higher at: 41.047 vs. CTJHY (10.974). CTJHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.45B vs. ETRUF (-1.79M). CTJHY has higher revenues than ETRUF: CTJHY (9.5B) vs ETRUF (0).
CTJHYETRUFCTJHY / ETRUF
Capitalization420M3.74M11,227%
EBITDA1.45B-1.79M-81,191%
Gain YTD10.97441.04727%
P/E Ratio4.85N/A-
Revenue9.5B0-
Total CashN/A269K-
Total DebtN/A134K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTJHY: Fundamental Ratings
CTJHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
81
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTJHYETRUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ETRUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAT2.840.02
+0.71%
Nordic American Tanker
BAP251.881.52
+0.61%
Credicorp Ltd
SEER2.07-0.01
-0.48%
Seer
TOWN36.75-0.74
-1.97%
TowneBank
RNAZ10.79-0.26
-2.35%
TransCode Therapeutics Inc

CTJHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTJHY and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTJHY and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTJHY
1D Price
Change %
CTJHY100%
N/A
SNLGF - CTJHY
29%
Poorly correlated
+29.31%
ATMTF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - CTJHY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCCFF - CTJHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+24.90%
More

ETRUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ETRUF has been loosely correlated with JMXXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ETRUF jumps, then JMXXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ETRUF
1D Price
Change %
ETRUF100%
N/A
JMXXF - ETRUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATMTF - ETRUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBRFF - ETRUF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTJHY - ETRUF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCAF - ETRUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More