CTJHY
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
389.06M
GCCFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTJHY vs GCCFF

Header iconCTJHY vs GCCFF Comparison
Open Charts CTJHY vs GCCFFBanner chart's image
Citic Resources Holdings
Price$9.00
Change-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization389.06M
Golden Cariboo Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization3.49M
CTJHY vs GCCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTJHY vs. GCCFF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTJHY is a Hold and GCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CTJHY: $7.67 vs. GCCFF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CTJHY and GCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTJHY: 100% vs. GCCFF: 2%
Market capitalization -- CTJHY: $389.06M vs. GCCFF: $3.49M
CTJHY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $389.06M. GCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $3.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTJHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTJHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTJHY is a better buy in the long-term than GCCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTJHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCCFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTJHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GCCFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCCFF is a better buy in the short-term than CTJHY.

Price Growth

CTJHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTJHY($389M) has a higher market cap than GCCFF($3.49M). CTJHY YTD gains are higher at: 10.974 vs. GCCFF (-62.777). CTJHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 634M vs. GCCFF (-5.38M). CTJHY has more cash in the bank: 4.42B vs. GCCFF (337K). CTJHY has higher revenues than GCCFF: CTJHY (14.9B) vs GCCFF (0).
CTJHYGCCFFCTJHY / GCCFF
Capitalization389M3.49M11,137%
EBITDA634M-5.38M-11,775%
Gain YTD10.974-62.777-17%
P/E Ratio4.85N/A-
Revenue14.9B0-
Total Cash4.42B337K1,311,276%
Total Debt4.36BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTJHY vs GCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
CTJHY
GCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
79100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6094
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTJHY's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (50). This means that CTJHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTJHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that CTJHY’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTJHY's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (100). This means that CTJHY’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTJHY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCCFF (94). This means that CTJHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTJHY's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as GCCFF (95). This means that CTJHY’s stock grew similarly to GCCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTJHYGCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXOSX36.46N/A
N/A
Manning & Napier Overseas Series I
FIIAX23.62N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II A
AASOX18.27N/A
N/A
Alger Small Cap Growth I-2
JLCWX77.69N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R6
CTSIX45.22-0.32
-0.70%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth I

CTJHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTJHY and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTJHY and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTJHY
1D Price
Change %
CTJHY100%
N/A
SNLGF - CTJHY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
ATMTF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - CTJHY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCCFF - CTJHY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A

GCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCCFF and CTJHY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCCFF and CTJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCCFF
1D Price
Change %
GCCFF100%
N/A
CTJHY - GCCFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARWF - GCCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
FTMDF - GCCFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
FWEDF - GCCFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.76%
FSUGY - GCCFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More