CTJHY
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
403.1M
JMXXF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$1.96 (-93.33%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
260.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTJHY vs JMXXF

Header iconCTJHY vs JMXXF Comparison
Open Charts CTJHY vs JMXXFBanner chart's image
Citic Resources Holdings
Price$9.00
Change-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization403.1M
Jupiter Mines
Price$0.14
Change-$1.96 (-93.33%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization260.95M
CTJHY vs JMXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTJHY vs. JMXXF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTJHY is a Hold and JMXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CTJHY: $8.34 vs. JMXXF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CTJHY and JMXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTJHY: 100% vs. JMXXF: 693%
Market capitalization -- CTJHY: $403.1M vs. JMXXF: $260.95M
CTJHY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $403.1M. JMXXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $260.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTJHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJMXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTJHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JMXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, JMXXF is a better buy in the long-term than CTJHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTJHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JMXXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTJHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • JMXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTJHY is a better buy in the short-term than JMXXF.

Price Growth

CTJHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JMXXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -93.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTJHY is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.03% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTJHY($403M) has a higher market cap than JMXXF($261M). JMXXF has higher P/E ratio than CTJHY: JMXXF (4.62) vs CTJHY (3.82). JMXXF YTD gains are higher at: 40.000 vs. CTJHY (10.974). CTJHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.14B vs. JMXXF (59.4M).
CTJHYJMXXFCTJHY / JMXXF
Capitalization403M261M154%
EBITDA1.14B59.4M1,924%
Gain YTD10.97440.00027%
P/E Ratio3.824.6283%
Revenue4.68BN/A-
Total CashN/A60.6M-
Total DebtN/A42.5M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTJHY vs JMXXF: Fundamental Ratings
CTJHY
JMXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4191
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8375
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8222
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTJHY's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as JMXXF (6). This means that CTJHY’s stock grew similarly to JMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CTJHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JMXXF (100). This means that CTJHY’s stock grew similarly to JMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

JMXXF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CTJHY (83). This means that JMXXF’s stock grew similarly to CTJHY’s over the last 12 months.

JMXXF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CTJHY (58). This means that JMXXF’s stock grew similarly to CTJHY’s over the last 12 months.

JMXXF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTJHY (82). This means that JMXXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTJHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTJHYJMXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSXAX51.89N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx A
JSIGX22.20N/A
N/A
Jacob Small Cap Growth Institutional
POIIX16.56N/A
N/A
Polen International Growth Institutional
HESGX43.45N/A
N/A
Horizon Defensive Core Investor
PGHAX62.62N/A
N/A
Putnam Global Health Care R6

CTJHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTJHY and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTJHY and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTJHY
1D Price
Change %
CTJHY100%
N/A
SNLGF - CTJHY
29%
Poorly correlated
+8.82%
ATMTF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - CTJHY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCCFF - CTJHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+8.89%
More

JMXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JMXXF has been loosely correlated with CAPFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JMXXF jumps, then CAPFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JMXXF
1D Price
Change %
JMXXF100%
N/A
CAPFF - JMXXF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATMTF - JMXXF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMLTF - JMXXF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ETRUF - JMXXF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NBRFF - JMXXF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More