CTJHY
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
429.57M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SNLGF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
42.25M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTJHY vs SNLGF

Header iconCTJHY vs SNLGF Comparison
Open Charts CTJHY vs SNLGFBanner chart's image
Citic Resources Holdings
Price$9.00
Change-$0.30 (-3.23%)
Volume$100
Capitalization429.57M
SAN LORENZO GOLD
Price$0.53
Change+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization42.25M
CTJHY vs SNLGF Comparison Chart in %
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTJHY vs. SNLGF commentary
Oct 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTJHY is a Hold and SNLGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CTJHY: $7.67 vs. SNLGF: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: CTJHY and SNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTJHY: 100% vs. SNLGF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CTJHY: $419.16M vs. SNLGF: $42.25M
CTJHY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $419.16M. SNLGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $42.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTJHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTJHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CTJHY and SNLGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTJHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNLGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTJHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SNLGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTJHY is a better buy in the short-term than SNLGF.

Price Growth

CTJHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNLGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +9.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +34.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +330.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+9.16% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTJHY($430M) has a higher market cap than SNLGF($42.2M). SNLGF has higher P/E ratio than CTJHY: SNLGF (33.10) vs CTJHY (4.85). SNLGF YTD gains are higher at: 1457.482 vs. CTJHY (10.974). CTJHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 634M vs. SNLGF (-249.66K). CTJHY has more cash in the bank: 4.42B vs. SNLGF (1.03M). SNLGF has less debt than CTJHY: SNLGF (1.98M) vs CTJHY (4.36B). CTJHY has higher revenues than SNLGF: CTJHY (14.9B) vs SNLGF (0).
CTJHYSNLGFCTJHY / SNLGF
Capitalization430M42.2M1,019%
EBITDA634M-249.66K-253,944%
Gain YTD10.9741457.4821%
P/E Ratio4.8533.1015%
Revenue14.9B0-
Total Cash4.42B1.03M428,198%
Total Debt4.36B1.98M220,131%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTJHY: Fundamental Ratings
CTJHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTJHYSNLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVUAX16.52N/A
N/A
American Century Mid Cap Value I
KTRIX9.60N/A
N/A
DWS Global Income Builder Inst
HSEIX12.56N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Value I
IESGX25.85N/A
N/A
Sit ESG Growth I
GRMAX30.90N/A
N/A
Nationwide S&P 500 Index A

CTJHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTJHY and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTJHY and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTJHY
1D Price
Change %
CTJHY100%
N/A
SNLGF - CTJHY
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.92%
ATMTF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - CTJHY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCCFF - CTJHY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A

SNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNLGF has been loosely correlated with WTRNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNLGF jumps, then WTRNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLGF
1D Price
Change %
SNLGF100%
+3.92%
WTRNF - SNLGF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - SNLGF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTJHY - SNLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRYF - SNLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
ILKAF - SNLGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
More