CTJHY
Price
$8.11
Change
-$1.12 (-12.13%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
SNLGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

CTJHY vs SNLGF

Header iconCTJHY vs SNLGF Comparison
Open Charts CTJHY vs SNLGFBanner chart's image
Citic Resources Holdings
Price$8.11
Change-$1.12 (-12.13%)
Volume$374
CapitalizationN/A
SAN LORENZO GOLD
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
CTJHY vs SNLGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTJHY vs. SNLGF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTJHY is a Hold and SNLGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CTJHY: $8.11 vs. SNLGF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: CTJHY and SNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTJHY: 100% vs. SNLGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTJHY: $403.1M vs. SNLGF: $2.87M
CTJHY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $403.1M. SNLGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTJHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTJHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTJHY is a better buy in the long-term than SNLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTJHY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CTJHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CTJHY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNLGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTJHY($403M) has a higher market cap than SNLGF($2.87M). CTJHY YTD gains are higher at: 1.414 vs. SNLGF (-53.474).
CTJHYSNLGFCTJHY / SNLGF
Capitalization403M2.87M14,047%
EBITDA1.14BN/A-
Gain YTD1.414-53.474-3%
P/E Ratio3.82N/A-
Revenue4.68BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTJHY: Fundamental Ratings
CTJHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTJHYSNLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTJHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FITFX13.23-0.05
-0.38%
Fidelity Flex International Index
PRJIX59.22-0.32
-0.54%
T. Rowe Price New Horizons I
BRUMX15.55-0.10
-0.64%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity R4
NEFOX31.81-0.32
-1.00%
Natixis Oakmark A
JACDX10.47-0.29
-2.70%
JHancock Global Environmental Opps R6

CTJHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTJHY and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTJHY and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTJHY
1D Price
Change %
CTJHY100%
N/A
SNLGF - CTJHY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMTF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETRUF - CTJHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - CTJHY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCCFF - CTJHY
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.12%
More

SNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNLGF has been loosely correlated with WTRNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNLGF jumps, then WTRNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLGF
1D Price
Change %
SNLGF100%
N/A
WTRNF - SNLGF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - SNLGF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMYLF - SNLGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OBRUF - SNLGF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTJHY - SNLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More