Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTLAX vs RLBAX
CTLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CTLAX vs RLBAX
American Funds College 2033 529A
Price$13.86
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.09B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.17
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.26B
CTLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTLAX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. CTLAX (4.09B). CTLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CTLAX (2.49) vs RLBAX (1.15). CTLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CTLAX (10 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CTLAX (0.72). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CTLAX (6.00). CTLAX (250) and RLBAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.46 vs. RLBAX (9.46). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.69 vs. CTLAX (20.97).
| CTLAX | RLBAX | CTLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.594 | 12.515 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.09B | 262B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 1.15 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.46 | 9.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.84 | 39.28 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.97 | 38.69 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.98 | 70.15 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement