Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTLFX vs RLBAX
CTLFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts CTLFX vs RLBAX
American Funds College 2033 529F1
Price$14.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.14B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.59
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
CTLFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTLFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTLFX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. CTLFX (4.14B). CTLFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: CTLFX (2.60) vs RLBAX (1.10). CTLFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: CTLFX (11 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than CTLFX (0.76). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CTLFX (6.00). CTLFX (250) and RLBAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.20 vs. RLBAX (8.99). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.51 vs. CTLFX (22.95).
| CTLFX | RLBAX | CTLFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.31 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.31 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.500 | 13.858 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.14B | 266B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 1.10 | 236% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.20 | 8.99 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.20 | 44.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.95 | 40.51 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.26 | 70.61 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement