CTM
Price
$1.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
100.44M
FCCN
Price
$2.19
Change
-$0.06 (-2.67%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
166.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTM vs FCCN

Header iconCTM vs FCCN Comparison
Open Charts CTM vs FCCNBanner chart's image
Castellum
Price$1.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization100.44M
Spectral Capital
Price$2.19
Change-$0.06 (-2.67%)
Volume$972
Capitalization166.38M
CTM vs FCCN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTM vs. FCCN commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTM is a Hold and FCCN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CTM: $1.08 vs. FCCN: $2.19)
Brand notoriety: CTM and FCCN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTM: 41% vs. FCCN: 6%
Market capitalization -- CTM: $100.44M vs. FCCN: $166.38M
CTM [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $100.44M. FCCN’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $166.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $231.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCCN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCCN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTM is a better buy in the long-term than FCCN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCCN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FCCN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CTM and FCCN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CTM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +8.00% price change this week, while FCCN (@Information Technology Services) price change was -4.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.66% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCN($166M) has a higher market cap than CTM($100M). CTM YTD gains are higher at: -46.000 vs. FCCN (-64.620). FCCN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.6M vs. CTM (-4.58M). CTM has more cash in the bank: 14.7M vs. FCCN (6.08K). FCCN has less debt than CTM: FCCN (10K) vs CTM (5.38M). CTM has higher revenues than FCCN: CTM (47.6M) vs FCCN (0).
CTMFCCNCTM / FCCN
Capitalization100M166M60%
EBITDA-4.58M-3.6M127%
Gain YTD-46.000-64.62071%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue47.6M0-
Total Cash14.7M6.08K241,856%
Total Debt5.38M10K53,770%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTM vs FCCN: Fundamental Ratings
CTM
FCCN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
142
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3583
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTM's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCCN (99). This means that CTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCCN’s over the last 12 months.

FCCN's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CTM (100). This means that FCCN’s stock grew similarly to CTM’s over the last 12 months.

CTM's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as FCCN (100). This means that CTM’s stock grew similarly to FCCN’s over the last 12 months.

CTM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCCN (83). This means that CTM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCCN’s over the last 12 months.

CTM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCCN (100). This means that CTM’s stock grew similarly to FCCN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMFCCN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FCCN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLMDF0.03N/A
N/A
XLMEDIA PLC
KTERF36.10N/A
N/A
Keio Corp.
GRPRF0.75N/A
N/A
GRUPO ROTOPLAS S A B
INIKF0.06N/A
N/A
IONIK CORP.
PRDSF5.90-0.30
-4.84%
Prada Spa

CTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTM and BBAI have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTM and BBAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTM
1D Price
Change %
CTM100%
N/A
BBAI - CTM
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
JFU - CTM
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.29%
INOD - CTM
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.79%
GDYN - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
VNET - CTM
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.40%
More

FCCN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCCN and AMADF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCCN and AMADF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCCN
1D Price
Change %
FCCN100%
-2.67%
AMADF - FCCN
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.66%
CTM - FCCN
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARBB - FCCN
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
NOTE - FCCN
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
APMRF - FCCN
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More