CTMLF
Price
$8.78
Change
-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
WW
Price
$31.44
Change
+$0.43 (+1.39%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
313.99M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTMLF vs WW

Header iconCTMLF vs WW Comparison
Open Charts CTMLF vs WWBanner chart's image
Corporate Travel Management
Price$8.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Volume$900
Capitalization1.51B
WW International
Price$31.44
Change+$0.43 (+1.39%)
Volume$310.25K
Capitalization313.99M
CTMLF vs WW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMLF vs. WW commentary
Aug 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMLF is a Hold and WW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CTMLF: $8.78 vs. WW: $31.44)
Brand notoriety: CTMLF: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
CTMLF represents the Consumer Sundries, while WW is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMLF: 46% vs. WW: 87%
Market capitalization -- CTMLF: $1.51B vs. WW: $313.99M
CTMLF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $1.51B. WW’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $313.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $185.41B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.06B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WW is a better buy in the long-term than CTMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CTMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CTMLF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -0.15% price change this week, while WW (@Personnel Services) price change was -0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +173.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+2.77% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+0.94% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTMLF($1.51B) has a higher market cap than WW($314M). CTMLF has higher P/E ratio than WW: CTMLF (31.01) vs WW (2.32). WW YTD gains are higher at: 2375.591 vs. CTMLF (11.055). WW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. CTMLF (178M). WW has more cash in the bank: 152M vs. CTMLF (135M). CTMLF has less debt than WW: CTMLF (38.8M) vs WW (477M). WW (741M) and CTMLF (708M) have equivalent revenues.
CTMLFWWCTMLF / WW
Capitalization1.51B314M482%
EBITDA178M1.15B15%
Gain YTD11.0552375.5910%
P/E Ratio31.012.321,336%
Revenue708M741M96%
Total Cash135M152M89%
Total Debt38.8M477M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMLF vs WW: Fundamental Ratings
CTMLF
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9972
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8384
SMR RATING
1..100
7811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WW's Valuation (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTMLF (96) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as WW (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CTMLF’s stock grew similarly to WW’s over the last 12 months.

WW's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTMLF (78) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew significantly faster than CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTMLF (57) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WW (58) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CTMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LST37.980.63
+1.68%
Leuthold Select Industries ETF
EWA27.260.40
+1.49%
iShares MSCI Australia ETF
VICE36.070.36
+1.00%
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
DBEZ53.060.33
+0.63%
Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Eq ETF
PFFV23.230.06
+0.26%
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF

CTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMLF and HSWLF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMLF and HSWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMLF
1D Price
Change %
CTMLF100%
-0.15%
HSWLF - CTMLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCOM - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
HWGG - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRTGF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More