CTMLF
Price
$8.79
Change
+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
WW
Price
$42.99
Change
+$0.68 (+1.61%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
146.53M
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTMLF vs WW

Header iconCTMLF vs WW Comparison
Open Charts CTMLF vs WWBanner chart's image
Corporate Travel Management
Price$8.79
Change+$0.22 (+2.57%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.04B
WW International
Price$42.99
Change+$0.68 (+1.61%)
Volume$295.65K
Capitalization146.53M
CTMLF vs WW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTMLF vs. WW commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTMLF is a Hold and WW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CTMLF: $8.79 vs. WW: $42.99)
Brand notoriety: CTMLF: Not notable vs. WW: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTMLF: 136% vs. WW: 93%
Market capitalization -- CTMLF: $2.04B vs. WW: $146.53M
CTMLF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $2.04B. WW’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $146.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $10.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WW is a better buy in the long-term than CTMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTMLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CTMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CTMLF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WW (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -2.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +69.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

WW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (-2.72% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTMLF($2.04B) has a higher market cap than WW($147M). CTMLF has higher P/E ratio than WW: CTMLF (92.59) vs WW (4.87). WW YTD gains are higher at: 3285.040 vs. CTMLF (11.219). CTMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86.8M vs. WW (74.7M). CTMLF has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. WW (109M). CTMLF has less debt than WW: CTMLF (48.4M) vs WW (1.49B). WW has higher revenues than CTMLF: WW (890M) vs CTMLF (508M).
CTMLFWWCTMLF / WW
Capitalization2.04B147M1,390%
EBITDA86.8M74.7M116%
Gain YTD11.2193285.0400%
P/E Ratio92.594.871,900%
Revenue508M890M57%
Total Cash142M109M130%
Total Debt48.4M1.49B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTMLF vs WW: Fundamental Ratings
CTMLF
WW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4615
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10066
SMR RATING
1..100
7811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WW's Valuation (88) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTMLF (97) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTMLF (100) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

WW's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTMLF (78) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew significantly faster than CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

WW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CTMLF (55) in the null industry. This means that WW’s stock grew similarly to CTMLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTMLF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CTMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than WW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIBIX30.63N/A
N/A
Thornburg Investment Income Builder I
MGOSX14.62N/A
N/A
Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth R6
HRLYX9.25N/A
N/A
Hartford Real Asset Y
UGTCX28.18N/A
N/A
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy C
RIVHX18.98-0.05
-0.26%
American Funds International Vntg R-2E

CTMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTMLF and HSWLF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTMLF and HSWLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTMLF
1D Price
Change %
CTMLF100%
N/A
HSWLF - CTMLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCOM - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
HWGG - CTMLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRTGF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - CTMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More