Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTOGX vs FSMAX
CTOGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTOGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth R6
Price$15.36
Change+$0.22 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.36M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
CTOGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTOGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOGX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. CTOGX (31.4M). CTOGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTOGX (2.70) vs FSMAX (0.50). CTOGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTOGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTOGX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTOGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). CTOGX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTOGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.16 vs. FSMAX (14.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. CTOGX (47.14).
| CTOGX | FSMAX | CTOGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.04 | 3,057% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.04 | 4,371% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.264 | 0.044 | 5,143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.4M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 0.50 | 540% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.16 | 14.57 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.02 | 43.69 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.14 | 64.38 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.79 | - |