Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTOGX vs FSMAX
CTOGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTOGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth R6
Price$17.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.34M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.73
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
CTOGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTOGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. CTOGX (36.3M). CTOGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTOGX (2.39) vs FSMAX (0.44). CTOGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTOGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTOGX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTOGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). CTOGX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTOGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.80 vs. FSMAX (18.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.51 vs. CTOGX (50.89).
| CTOGX | FSMAX | CTOGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.04 | 3,057% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.04 | 4,371% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.446 | 10.838 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.3M | 41B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.39 | 0.44 | 538% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.80 | 18.16 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.22 | 57.15 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.89 | 60.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement