CTOS
Price
$4.62
Change
-$0.18 (-3.75%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.4B
9 days until earnings call
OMF
Price
$54.17
Change
-$1.83 (-3.27%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CTOS vs OMF

Header iconCTOS vs OMF Comparison
Open Charts CTOS vs OMFBanner chart's image
Custom Truck One Source
Price$4.62
Change-$0.18 (-3.75%)
Volume$494.56K
Capitalization1.4B
OneMain Holdings
Price$54.17
Change-$1.83 (-3.27%)
Volume$856.29K
Capitalization6.02B
CTOS vs OMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTOS vs. OMF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOS is a Hold and OMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CTOS: $4.62 vs. OMF: $54.17)
Brand notoriety: CTOS and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTOS: 66% vs. OMF: 93%
Market capitalization -- CTOS: $1.4B vs. OMF: $6.02B
CTOS [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.4B. OMF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTOS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CTOS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than CTOS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTOS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTOS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTOS is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

CTOS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -7.97% price change this week, while OMF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -4.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTOS is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.42% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMF($6.02B) has a higher market cap than CTOS($1.4B). CTOS has higher P/E ratio than OMF: CTOS (28.00) vs OMF (9.44). OMF YTD gains are higher at: 5.855 vs. CTOS (-3.950). CTOS has less debt than OMF: CTOS (2.2B) vs OMF (19.8B). OMF has higher revenues than CTOS: OMF (4.28B) vs CTOS (1.87B).
CTOSOMFCTOS / OMF
Capitalization1.4B6.02B23%
EBITDA408MN/A-
Gain YTD-3.9505.855-67%
P/E Ratio28.009.44297%
Revenue1.87B4.28B44%
Total Cash10.3MN/A-
Total Debt2.2B19.8B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTOS vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
CTOS
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8386
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9421
SMR RATING
1..100
907
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTOS (98) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTOS’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTOS (94) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTOS’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's SMR Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTOS (90) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTOS’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as CTOS (63) in the null industry. This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to CTOS’s over the last 12 months.

CTOS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as OMF (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that CTOS’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTOSOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTOS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPH91.260.92
+1.02%
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
WRND31.70N/A
N/A
NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
KNG50.80-0.06
-0.11%
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500® Dv Ast Tgt Inc ETF
CPER28.60-0.47
-1.62%
United States Copper Index
QVOY25.39-0.47
-1.82%
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with ENVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then ENVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
-3.27%
ENVA - OMF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.77%
COF - OMF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
SYF - OMF
67%
Closely correlated
-3.82%
DFS - OMF
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
SLM - OMF
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
More