CTOWY
Price
$11.40
Change
-$0.60 (-5.00%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
19.86B
IHS
Price
$6.03
Change
+$0.23 (+3.97%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.15B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTOWY vs IHS

Header iconCTOWY vs IHS Comparison
Open Charts CTOWY vs IHSBanner chart's image
China Tower
Price$11.40
Change-$0.60 (-5.00%)
Volume$159
Capitalization19.86B
IHS Holding
Price$6.03
Change+$0.23 (+3.97%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization1.15B
CTOWY vs IHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTOWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTOWY vs. IHS commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTOWY is a Hold and IHS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CTOWY: $10.33)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTOWY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • CTOWY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTOWY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IHS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTOWY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IHS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IHS is a better buy in the short-term than CTOWY.

Price Growth

CTOWY (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTOWY($19.9B) has a higher market cap than IHS($1.15B). IHS has higher P/E ratio than CTOWY: IHS (113.64) vs CTOWY (14.99). IHS YTD gains are higher at: 106.507 vs. CTOWY (-5.882). CTOWY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.1B vs. IHS (-998.47M). CTOWY has higher revenues than IHS: CTOWY (92.2B) vs IHS (2.13B).
CTOWYIHSCTOWY / IHS
Capitalization19.9B1.15B1,735%
EBITDA64.1B-998.47M-6,420%
Gain YTD-5.882106.507-6%
P/E Ratio14.99113.6413%
Revenue92.2B2.13B4,337%
Total CashN/A294M-
Total DebtN/A4.11B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTOWYIHS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTOWY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFCCX20.940.28
+1.36%
Emerald Insights C
FLACX81.660.70
+0.86%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel C
MISCX19.030.13
+0.69%
BNY Mellon Small Cap Multi-Strategy Inv
GCCSX33.050.17
+0.52%
Gabelli Small Cap Growth C
JFESX39.290.06
+0.15%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic I

CTOWY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTOWY and LICT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTOWY and LICT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTOWY
1D Price
Change %
CTOWY100%
N/A
LICT - CTOWY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHS - CTOWY
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
FYBR - CTOWY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUCSF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LLEIF - CTOWY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IHS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IHS has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IHS jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHS
1D Price
Change %
IHS100%
+3.97%
S - IHS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
LILA - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
TDS - IHS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
LBRDK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
LILAK - IHS
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More