CTS vs FDTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Hold and FDTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.93% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-0.78% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
CTS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CTS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% |
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| HBM - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -6.70% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||