Advertisement
CTS vs TPH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Buy and TPH is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -6.69% price change this week, while TPH (@Homebuilding) price change was -2.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
TPH is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-2.77% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
@Homebuilding (-2.64% weekly)Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.
| CTS | TPH | CTS / TPH | |
| Capitalization | 1.13B | 3.71B | 31% |
| EBITDA | 110M | 455M | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -25.540 | -15.058 | 170% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.22 | 11.08 | 164% |
| Revenue | 516M | 3.72B | 14% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 869M | - |
| Total Debt | 112M | 1.46B | 8% |
CTS | TPH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTS's Valuation (38) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TPH (78) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TPH’s over the last 12 months.
TPH's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as CTS (48) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TPH’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
TPH's SMR Rating (58) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as CTS (64) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TPH’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TPH (79) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew similarly to TPH’s over the last 12 months.
TPH's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Homebuilding industry is in the same range as CTS (85) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TPH’s stock grew similarly to CTS’s over the last 12 months.
| CTS | TPH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 66% | 16 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
TPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPH has been closely correlated with CCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TPH jumps, then CCS could also see price increases.