CTS vs TYOYY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTS is a Hold and TYOYY is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTYOYY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CTS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TYOYY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYOYY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TYOYY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -6.58% price change this week, while TYOYY (@Electronic Components) price change was +4.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
TYOYY is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+2.17% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| CTS | TYOYY | CTS / TYOYY | |
| Capitalization | 1.59B | 1.78B | 90% |
| EBITDA | 105M | 55.9B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 21.337 | -44.366 | -48% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.29 | 37.04 | 74% |
| Revenue | 513M | 335B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 94.9M | 98.8B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 129M | 164B | 0% |
CTS | TYOYY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 32 | 91 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TYOYY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTS (48) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TYOYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for TYOYY (100) in the null industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew significantly faster than TYOYY’s over the last 12 months.
TYOYY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTS (64) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TYOYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTS’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TYOYY (88) in the null industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TYOYY’s over the last 12 months.
CTS's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TYOYY (91) in the null industry. This means that CTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TYOYY’s over the last 12 months.
| CTS | TYOYY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 14 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LMRNX | 31.60 | -0.73 | -2.26% |
| 1919 Socially Responsive Balanced I | |||
| NGDAX | 28.93 | -0.94 | -3.15% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth A | |||
| PBFDX | 31.50 | -1.03 | -3.17% |
| Payson Total Return | |||
| JCAPX | 56.88 | -1.91 | -3.25% |
| Janus Henderson Forty I | |||
| PFPGX | 26.04 | -0.98 | -3.63% |
| Parnassus Growth Equity Institutional | |||
CTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTS has been loosely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTS | 100% | -4.90% | ||
| KN - CTS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| LFUS - CTS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| ROG - CTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| PLXS - CTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| TTMI - CTS | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.88% | ||
More | ||||
TYOYY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TYOYY has been loosely correlated with MRAAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TYOYY jumps, then MRAAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TYOYY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYOYY | 100% | +9.65% | ||
| MRAAY - TYOYY | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| OMRNY - TYOYY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
| TTDKF - TYOYY | 23% Poorly correlated | -11.02% | ||
| CTS - TYOYY | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.90% | ||
| TTMI - TYOYY | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.88% | ||
More | ||||