CTSDF vs CXGEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTSDF is a Hold and CXGEF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTSDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCXGEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CTSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CXGEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTSDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXGEF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTSDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CXGEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CTSDF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -3.16% price change this week, while CXGEF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.71%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Information Technology Services (-1.92% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| CTSDF | CXGEF | CTSDF / CXGEF | |
| Capitalization | 464M | 49.3M | 941% |
| EBITDA | -42.01M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -24.092 | -10.931 | 220% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.65 | - |
| Revenue | 2.56B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 180M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 308M | N/A | - |
| CTSDF | CXGEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 22% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 11% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 8% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPY | 604.29 | -2.50 | -0.41% |
| SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust | |||
| TIME | 30.55 | -0.17 | -0.54% |
| Clockwise Core Equity & Innovation ETF | |||
| DFSU | 38.98 | -0.23 | -0.59% |
| Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF | |||
| BMVP | 47.90 | -0.30 | -0.63% |
| Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | |||
| AGOX | 28.96 | -0.30 | -1.03% |
| Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF | |||
CTSDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CTSDF and CXGEF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTSDF and CXGEF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTSDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTSDF | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| CXGEF - CTSDF | 33% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IBM - CTSDF | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| EPAM - CTSDF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
| FIS - CTSDF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| GIB - CTSDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||
CXGEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CXGEF and CTSDF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXGEF and CTSDF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXGEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXGEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CTSDF - CXGEF | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| ATEAY - CXGEF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IBM - CXGEF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| ITFRF - CXGEF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BNXAF - CXGEF | 12% Poorly correlated | +20.35% | ||
More | ||||