Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTSIX vs NRGSX
CTSIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTSIX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth I
Price$44.16
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets529.97M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
CTSIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTSIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTSIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. CTSIX (530M). CTSIX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTSIX (2.06) vs NRGSX (0.07). CTSIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTSIX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTSIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTSIX: NRGSX (0) vs CTSIX (1000000). CTSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.23 vs. NRGSX (-14.54). CTSIX return over 5 years is better than : 38.15 vs. NRGSX (-10.73).
| CTSIX | NRGSX | CTSIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.74 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.416 | -7.544 | -231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 8.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 0.07 | 3,119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.23 | -14.54 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.77 | -4.05 | -1,822% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.15 | -10.73 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.29 | 3.75 | 4,624% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers