Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTSOX vs NRGSX
CTSOX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts CTSOX vs NRGSX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6
Price$44.96
Change+$0.54 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets530.39M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
CTSOX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTSOX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTSOX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. CTSOX (530M). CTSOX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: CTSOX (2.11) vs NRGSX (0.07). CTSOX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: CTSOX (6 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). CTSOX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). CTSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 229.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). CTSOX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTSOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). CTSOX return over 5 years is better than : 39.20 vs. NRGSX (-11.01).
| CTSOX | NRGSX | CTSOX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.74 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.74 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.942 | -7.590 | -250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 530M | 8.19B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 0.07 | 3,184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | -14.62 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.47 | -4.10 | -1,867% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.20 | -11.01 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement