CTTAF
Price
$83.98
Change
-$2.46 (-2.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.98B
VC
Price
$125.13
Change
-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.41B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAF vs VC

Header iconCTTAF vs VC Comparison
Open Charts CTTAF vs VCBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$83.98
Change-$2.46 (-2.85%)
Volume$26
Capitalization16.98B
Visteon
Price$125.13
Change-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Volume$208.15K
Capitalization3.41B
CTTAF vs VC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAF vs. VC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAF is a Hold and VC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAF: $83.98 vs. VC: $125.13)
Brand notoriety: CTTAF and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAF: 9% vs. VC: 53%
Market capitalization -- CTTAF: $16.98B vs. VC: $3.41B
CTTAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $16.98B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTTAF is a better buy in the short-term than VC.

Price Growth

CTTAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.60% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

VC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAF($17B) has a higher market cap than VC($3.41B). CTTAF has higher P/E ratio than VC: CTTAF (12.93) vs VC (11.92). VC YTD gains are higher at: 41.361 vs. CTTAF (22.997). CTTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.38B vs. VC (443M). VC has less debt than CTTAF: VC (442M) vs CTTAF (8.52B). CTTAF has higher revenues than VC: CTTAF (39.6B) vs VC (3.82B).
CTTAFVCCTTAF / VC
Capitalization17B3.41B498%
EBITDA4.38B443M988%
Gain YTD22.99741.36156%
P/E Ratio12.9311.92109%
Revenue39.6B3.82B1,036%
Total Cash2.06BN/A-
Total Debt8.52B442M1,927%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAF vs VC: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAF
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
5240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
668
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTAF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VC (63) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VC’s over the last 12 months.

VC's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (100) in the null industry. This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

VC's SMR Rating (40) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (52) in the null industry. This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

VC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (54) in the null industry. This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

VC's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAF (66) in the null industry. This means that VC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAFVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PCITX26.490.28
+1.07%
Victory Pioneer International Equ C
LGMAX26.180.03
+0.11%
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation A
OSTGX16.88N/A
N/A
Osterweis Opportunity Fund
FNICX33.79-0.16
-0.47%
Fidelity Advisor New Insights C
GCFSX19.58-0.12
-0.61%
Gabelli Global Financial Services C

CTTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAF has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAF jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAF
1D Price
Change %
CTTAF100%
-2.85%
CTTAY - CTTAF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
VLEEY - CTTAF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
MGA - CTTAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
VC - CTTAF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
LEA - CTTAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
More