CTTAF
Price
$88.27
Change
-$0.37 (-0.42%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
VC
Price
$83.52
Change
+$0.85 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.23B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAF vs VC

Header iconCTTAF vs VC Comparison
Open Charts CTTAF vs VCBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$88.27
Change-$0.37 (-0.42%)
Volume$329
Capitalization16.01B
Visteon
Price$83.52
Change+$0.85 (+1.03%)
Volume$209.96K
Capitalization3.23B
CTTAF vs VC Comparison Chart
Loading...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAF vs. VC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAF is a Hold and VC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAF: $88.27 vs. VC: $83.52)
Brand notoriety: CTTAF and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAF: 129% vs. VC: 61%
Market capitalization -- CTTAF: $16.01B vs. VC: $3.23B
CTTAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $16.01B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CTTAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -1.12% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

VC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.27% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAF($16B) has a higher market cap than VC($3.23B). CTTAF has higher P/E ratio than VC: CTTAF (68.03) vs VC (6.87). CTTAF YTD gains are higher at: 29.283 vs. VC (-5.861). CTTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.19B vs. VC (378M). CTTAF has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. VC (515M). VC has less debt than CTTAF: VC (445M) vs CTTAF (8.01B). CTTAF has higher revenues than VC: CTTAF (40.4B) vs VC (3.95B).
CTTAFVCCTTAF / VC
Capitalization16B3.23B495%
EBITDA4.19B378M1,107%
Gain YTD29.283-5.861-500%
P/E Ratio68.036.87990%
Revenue40.4B3.95B1,022%
Total Cash2.38B515M462%
Total Debt8.01B445M1,800%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAF vs VC: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAF
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2764
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9479
SMR RATING
1..100
7139
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7623
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTAF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VC (67) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VC’s over the last 12 months.

VC's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (94) in the null industry. This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

VC's SMR Rating (39) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (71) in the null industry. This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as VC (61) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.

VC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAF (76) in the null industry. This means that VC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEAMX14.830.15
+1.02%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund C
ABCAX21.930.15
+0.69%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq A
FNFPX67.520.41
+0.61%
American Funds New Perspective 529-F-3
LKBAX28.09N/A
N/A
LKCM Balanced
BITSX27.09N/A
N/A
iShares Total US Stock Market Idx Instl

CTTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAF has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAF jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAF
1D Price
Change %
CTTAF100%
-0.42%
CTTAY - CTTAF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
VLEEY - CTTAF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.72%
MGA - CTTAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
VC - CTTAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
LEA - CTTAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More